The Chiropractic Board of Australia has had enough:
The Chiropractic Board of Australia cracks down to protect the public.
The Chiropractic Board of Australia is cracking down on chiropractors who step outside their primary role as healthcare practitioners and provide treatment that puts the public at risk.
To protect public safety, the Board has:
– ordered practitioners to remove all anti-vaccination material from their websites and clinics
– removed several courses from the list of approved CPD programs, and
– introduced random audits of practitioner compliance with the Board’s registration standards. [Media Release August 8 2013]
Ask yourself a question. What level of ineptitude must one reach, in their understanding of immunisation information and its provision, to claim, as part of an argument against immunisation, that vaccines are no damn good because they haven’t been subjected to a crossover trial? I call the level “Peak Dorey”:
Meet John de Voy. He has been manipulating customers for over thirty years, at Wynyard Chiropractic, in Sydney. He is a member of the Chiropractors’ Association of Australia; a member of the Australian Spinal Research Foundation; and is/was a member of the callous anti-vaccination fundamentalist group, the Australian Vaccination Network.
Even after all of the recent news surrounding the CBA and its crackdown on anti-vaccinationism in the industry, de Voy still has this page on his website:
I’m not going to include the whole thing. It is a mix of factoids interspersed with absolute bollocks and half-truths, all stirred up into a cauldron of scaremongering; the type of scaremongering of which Meryl Dorey herself would be proud.
I almost stopped reading it immediately. Look familiar?
None of the vaccines currently licensed in Australia have been subject to double-blind crossover placebo studies standard in medical testing.
Here are some more excerpts:
antibodies don’t necessary lead to immunity
almost all vaccine research has been paid for by the pharmaceutical company producing the vaccine and no independent testing has been conducted by Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration.
measles helps mature the immune system and may help prevent auto-immune illnesses such as cancer, asthma and allergies in later life. Rubella is an extremely mild disease of childhood
Hang on. This is starting to sound like Dorey’s 10 Reasons…
Many vaccines contain toxins and known carcinogens, including mercury, aluminium and formaldehyde
serious immediate side effects include emotional and behavioural issues, learning difficulties, motor and coordination difficulties, blindness and paralysis.
cheaper sources of vaccine culture have a heightened risk of being contaminated by foreign viruses and bacteria or combining with human DNA to form new diseases
Live viruses that are weakened for use in vaccines, such as those for measles, mumps and rubella, can also mutate back into virulent form at any time
I remember the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission used Dorey’s 10 Reasons… as the basis for their first findings against the AVN. Dorey since retracted the rubbish from her own website. But, I digress:
Since British Gastroenterologist Andrew Wakefield first linked vaccination to autism in 1988, hundreds of studies have verified Wakefield’s hypothesis that changes to the gut caused by vaccination can lead to changes in the brain, resulting in autism.
Hannah Poling…A further 5000 autism claims are pending in the special claims court specifically set up to administer the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Program for vaccine-related injuries.
Oh, no they’re not. Further, de Voy concludes:
The jury is still very much out…
I want to go all Derek and Clive on this guy, but, alas, we’re rated PG here.
I’ll leave you with some testimonials, as was the style at the time, and the hope and desire that this guy gets the de-registration he so lustfully desires:
This is what the Chiropractic Board of Australia has to say about the use of testimonials:
5 What is unacceptable advertising?
This section is intended to provide a clear indication of the
type of advertising of services that the boards consider to
be unacceptable. Where examples are provided, they are
intended to assist practitioners and other persons who
advertise regulated health services to comply with the
advertising provisions of the National Law. They are not
intended to be exhaustive.
To comply with s. 133 of the National Law and these
guidelines, advertising of services must not:
(d) use testimonials or purported testimonials
Update, only two hours later:
The CBA needs to act against de Foy. Thumbing his nose at the Board, he has just posted this testimonial. Faces blacked out by me: